<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why using a sensor in the simulation changes the results?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm wondering why the results (for example E-field or SAR value) change after adding a point sensor or line sensor to the simulation?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/100/why-using-a-sensor-in-the-simulation-changes-the-results</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:31:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/100.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:38:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why using a sensor in the simulation changes the results? on Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:55:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for your reply.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/249</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/249</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saya]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:55:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why using a sensor in the simulation changes the results? on Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:49:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Sensors by themselves do not affect results. However, adding a sensor to a simulation may change the grid, which may change the voxels, which may change the results.</p>
<p dir="auto">If adding sensors brings "unacceptably large" changes, it is usually a good indicator that your grid was (and probably still is) too coarse.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/248</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/248</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sylvain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:49:13 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>