<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why changing the simulation time in thermal simulation, does not change the result that much?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">I did the simulation of a lead in plane wave exactly like the tutorial "3.3.4 Heating from a standard active implantable medical device", when I change the simulation time in thermal simulation from 3600 s to 36000 s, the max temperature changes from 22.0035 to 22.0049. I would have expected higher value. I'm wondering what's the reason the temperature does not increase that much and is almost the same as before?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/106/why-changing-the-simulation-time-in-thermal-simulation-does-not-change-the-result-that-much</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:43:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/106.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:09:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why changing the simulation time in thermal simulation, does not change the result that much? on Thu, 13 Dec 2018 19:01:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Actually the temperature rise is very lower than what is measured in the lab and I'm wondering what is the reason.</p>
<p dir="auto">I extract the max temperature at a point using a line passing through the point (I find lines of the intersection of the 3 slices xy-xz-yz at max). But the value is much smaller than the value which a point sensor gives and also the max value which the color scale bar shows. What is the reason?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/288</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/288</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saya]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 19:01:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why changing the simulation time in thermal simulation, does not change the result that much? on Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:48:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The steady-state of the temperature equation, if it exists, is the temperature field when time goes to infinity. I don't understand what you are trying to achieve here, but setting the simulation time to a much larger value should give you the same solution as the stationary solver.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/287</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/287</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sylvain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:48:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why changing the simulation time in thermal simulation, does not change the result that much? on Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:42:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks. The max value of the color scale in the  stationary thermal solver is about 10 times higher than transient thermal solver. What should I change in the transient simulation to get the temperature value the same as stationary thermal solver?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/286</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/286</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saya]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:42:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why changing the simulation time in thermal simulation, does not change the result that much? on Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:15:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/saya" aria-label="Profile: Saya">@<bdi>Saya</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/281">Why changing the simulation time in thermal simulation, does not change the result that much?</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I'm wondering what's the reason the temperature does not increase that much and is almost the same as before?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The reason is probably simple physics: I imagine the EM field is not depositing a lot of power, so the temperature does not rise very much. In addition, there is a "cooling" effect from the 22C Dirichlet boundary condition. It is a bit like heating a large room with a small candle while the window is open...</p>
<p dir="auto">Note that you can use the Stationary Thermal solver to compute what the steady state is.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/284</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sylvain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:15:57 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>