<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Discussion on the slower simulation speed of EM FDTD for lower frequency electromagnetic field]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello everyone, I am currently doing some simulations of electromagnetic fields on the human body. In the process of using the EM FDTD module, I found that the module is not suitable for the analysis of low-frequency electromagnetic fields during the process of viewing the instruction manual and the actual simulation. You can use ARMA for analysis, but I don't know how to use it. I hope you can give me some suggestions.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/297/discussion-on-the-slower-simulation-speed-of-em-fdtd-for-lower-frequency-electromagnetic-field</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 04:40:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/297.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 09:18:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Discussion on the slower simulation speed of EM FDTD for lower frequency electromagnetic field on Sun, 31 Jan 2021 20:16:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">what is ARMA?</p>
<p dir="auto">FDTD is not adequate for any simulations where the wavelength is long  compared to the object being modeled</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://speag.swiss/products/semcad/modules/what-is-fdtd/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://speag.swiss/products/semcad/modules/what-is-fdtd/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/863</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.zmt.swiss/post/863</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hib]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 20:16:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>