Skip to content
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

ZMT zurich med tech

  1. Home
  2. Sim4Life
  3. Simulations & Solvers
  4. Volume average of SAR value

Volume average of SAR value

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Simulations & Solvers
10 Posts 2 Posters 1.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Saya
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    How can
    I calculate the volume average of SAR value in a sphere for example?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SylvainS Offline
      SylvainS Offline
      Sylvain
      ZMT
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Use the SAR Statistics algorithm (there is a checkbox that enables psSAR values too). You will get plenty of SAR-related data for every object in your simulation.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Saya
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thank you so much for your reply. And do I need to tick the checkbox Normalized Frequency-Domain Results in overall field and change the target value to the target value which could be calculated like tutorial 3.3.4.5?
        Thanks.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SylvainS Offline
          SylvainS Offline
          Sylvain
          ZMT
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Yes, you should in principle always normalize the fields before computing SAR.
          SAR values are "dimensional" quantities* and, as such, they only make sense in a specific "context of use": geometrical setup, power emitted by a device, etc... I can't say whether you should be using the same target value as in tutorial 3.3.4.5, as that really depends on your application.

          *The SAR is computed from the electric field, the intensity of which depends on the power radiated by the system, which itself depends on the input power.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            Saya
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Thanks.
            In some tutorials the fields are normalized to 1 W of target value for SAR in 3.3.1.5 and psSAR for 3.1.4.4, Is that fine If I do that for the other simulations
            or I need to normalize the fields to a target value that could be calculated using rms E-field and the formula in tutorial 3.3.4.5?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • SylvainS Offline
              SylvainS Offline
              Sylvain
              ZMT
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Again, it really depends on your application (i.e. what you are computing the SAR for). For regulatory submissions, normalization will be dictated by the so-called "conditions of use" or by some standards.

              In any case, I would suggest to choose normalization settings which are as close as possible to realistic scenarios and to always report the chosen power (or fields) target values along with the SAR values.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Saya
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Thank you for your explanation.
                the normalization is needed to be chosen just for calculating SAR value or for other quantities such as B-field it is needed as well?
                To find the exact target value, the rms E-field at the wire location (which is considered in the middle of the wire in tutorial 3.3.4.5) for a straight wire could be calculated easily. But I'm wondering for a bent wire, which position I need to consider to calculate the rms E field?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SylvainS Offline
                  SylvainS Offline
                  Sylvain
                  ZMT
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Normalization applies to the whole sensor, so all quantities (E, H, B, SAR, etc...) will be scaled accordingly.

                  As for which position you need to consider for the rms E field... well, that's up to you. Different normalization will lead to different SAR values.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Saya
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Thanks.
                    Actually for a bent wire when I extract the rms E field in a position and then calculate the target value, then I use this value to double check if it is correct, but I don't get 1 v/m for the E field at the same position which rms-E field is extracted. Does it mean I'm doing something wrong?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • SylvainS Offline
                      SylvainS Offline
                      Sylvain
                      ZMT
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      To get a meaningful answer to this kind of question, you would need to provide more detailed information: such as screenshots (you can copy/paste images into your posts), formula, numbers, etc...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Search