Skip to content
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

ZMT zurich med tech

  1. Home
  2. Sim4Life
  3. Simulations & Solvers
  4. Discussion on the slower simulation speed of EM FDTD for lower frequency electromagnetic field

Discussion on the slower simulation speed of EM FDTD for lower frequency electromagnetic field

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Simulations & Solvers
2 Posts 2 Posters 281 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    daolin_qu
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello everyone, I am currently doing some simulations of electromagnetic fields on the human body. In the process of using the EM FDTD module, I found that the module is not suitable for the analysis of low-frequency electromagnetic fields during the process of viewing the instruction manual and the actual simulation. You can use ARMA for analysis, but I don't know how to use it. I hope you can give me some suggestions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      hib
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      what is ARMA?

      FDTD is not adequate for any simulations where the wavelength is long compared to the object being modeled

      https://speag.swiss/products/semcad/modules/what-is-fdtd/

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Search