Pose User-Defined Surfaces/Entities

bryn

Most users are probably not aware that the Sim4Life poser tool supports user-defined surfaces. Basically, this means that triangle meshes, polylines or vertices can be added to the posable model and deform/move with the posable model.

This can be useful in combination with the shell models, e.g. you can define a patch on the surface and then pose the model with the patch.

Youtube Video

VigneshYork

Hi,

Thank you for this video. I would like to confirm one point.

I used the above video to create a patch on the thigh and use it to measure distance from femur to the skin. I repeated the operation after changing the posture of the model (mimicing walking). The distances between patch and femur varies between postures. I would like to confirm that when you pose the model, the soft tissues also deform similar to a real body? Meaning the distrubution of the soft tissues around the bone deforms (changes shape)?

Thanks

VigneshYork

Additionally, I get errors like this when I use the pose tool:

bryn

@VigneshYork yes, the soft tissue deforms using FEM solver modeling hyperelastic behavior.

bryn

@VigneshYork are you using the FEM posable ViP models? What model/version are you using? Which version of Sim4Life?
If you can describe the steps to reproduce, i can try to help or fix the issue.

VigneshYork

I am working on Sim4life 7.0.1.8169. I have a science license. I am not sure whether they are FEM posable VIP models but the two options of FEM shown in the tutotrial (~Draw FEM MESH and Draw FEM surface) are not there in my options (attached image). I use Duke cVip3.0

Thanks

VigneshYork

Do my models have the capability for soft tissue deformation? My goal is to image the bone using the difference in data (scattering parameters) collected before and after movement.

bryn

@VigneshYork the posable before the FEM version used linear blend skinning (LBS) to simulate soft tissue deformation. This may be less volume preserving.
The user-defined meshes don't work for the legacy LBS poser. Your license should also work for the v3.1 version of Duke. You can download it using the ViP download tool.

VigneshYork

Hi,

Thanks.I downloaded v3.1.1 and I got the options. Just to confirm, posing the leg , for example rotating the femur, would deform the thigh muscles, fat and skin?

Thanks

bryn

@VigneshYork yes, of course. That's the point of the poser

VigneshYork

Hi, thanks it works. I have one more questions:

I have drawn a patch on the femur and have placed multple WCS on it. I would like to place antennas on the pacth based on the WCS. How can I do this?

Thanks

bryn

Sorry, I never use these local grids. Not exactly sure what you mean. Do you still want to make the antenna follow the patch to the new posture (after posing)?

VigneshYork

No, I would like a method to place multiple antennas on the patch? Currently, I am manually adjusting it to place it as close to the skin as possible but would rather have it locate to a point on the patch.

bryn

there are probably multiple tools that could be used. would it be possible to share a screenshot of an antenna placed on the patch, to get an idea of the shape/size relative to the bone/patch?

VigneshYork

Hi, please find the image attached. Currently, I am using the dipole antenna from the tutorials and would like to place it on the patch (pink) on the shin in vertical configuration.

The idea is to replace the dipole antenna with a patch antenna later

bryn

I guess you mean normal (to skin) direction, not vertical direction? The move tool has a sub-tool that allows to align an entity with a target direction. Probably it could be used to align the antenna with the grid.

If I learn how to use it I will post a gif animation. Else, if you figure it out, please share.

VigneshYork

Yup normal to the skin surface. Okay, thank you

bryn

You can place a local grid on the surface (or multiple). In the video below I first

select a triangle on the mesh
create a patch
extract it as triangle mesh
and then place the local grid on this triangle

I think this may not be necessary, i.e. you could directly place the local grid on the surface. But maybe the procedure above can help to make it more precise.

An easy way to apply the transform is to get it in Python:

# assuming you select the WCS and then the electrode
wcs = XCoreModeling.GetActiveModel().SelectedEntities[0]
device = XCoreModeling.GetActiveModel().SelectedEntities[1]

device.ApplyTransform(wcs.Transform)

This assumes the "device" was centered at the origin, and aligned with the z-axis. If this is not the case, you should first position the template antenna/device with the z-axis at the origin.

Youtube Video

VigneshYork

Hello Bryn,

That looks perfect. Thank you

VigneshYork

Hello Bryn,

Thank you for your support. I have one question regarding the ViP models:

If you change the properties of bone (cortical, cancellous and marrow) to that of muscle, would they all merge together when you build the voxels? For example, if I apply a microwave imaging algorithm to the leg with all bone properties changed to muscle, would I get scattering due to muscle-bone interface? Is this scattering due to difference in properties or due to the shape ?

Thanks

ZMT zurich med tech

Pose User-Defined Surfaces/Entities